Carbon 14 dating and chemistry lab Jacksonville nc adult chat
This means that in old-earth terminology, carbon-14 decays “quickly.” Thus, if a bone (or some other material that is made of carbon) is really millions of years old and hasn’t been contaminated, you wouldn’t expect to find any carbon-14 in it.The carbon-14 should have long since decayed to the point where it is no longer detectable, even with the best scientific instruments we have today.One of the more recent developments is the carbon dating of bones and other carbon-containing materials that are supposedly millions of years old.Carbon dating uses the radioactive decay of carbon-14 into nitrogen-14, which currently has a half-life of 5,730 years.However, creation scientists have carbon-dated fossils, diamonds, and coal that are all supposed to be millions of years old.Nevertheless, they all have detectable amounts of carbon-14 in them.As I have noted previously, it’s a wonderful time to be a young-earth creationist.
If these studies are accurate, they show that there is something wrong with the old-earth view: Either carbon dating is not the reliable tool it is thought to be for “recent” dating, or the fossils and materials that are supposed to be millions of years old are not really that old. While these studies use several different samples, they represent the work of only a few scientists.Founded in 2002 by Nobel Laureate Carl Wieman, the Ph ET Interactive Simulations project at the University of Colorado Boulder creates free interactive math and science simulations.Ph ET sims are based on extensive education research and engage students through an intuitive, game-like environment where students learn through exploration and discovery. For example, this study shows detectable levels of carbon-14 in a range of carbon-containing materials that are supposedly 1-500 million years old.Surprisingly, the study includes from several different locations!
As a result, it is always possible that they are not as reliable as they seem.